Evaluating team work in obstetric emergencies. Do we have the tools needed?

Authors

  • Miguel Ángel Ródenas Monteagudo FEA Anestesia y Reanimación. Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia.
  • Odette Gutiérrez Pérez FEA Anestesia y Reanimación. Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia.
  • Eva Romero García FEA Anestesia y Reanimación. Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia.
  • Pilar Argente Navarro  Jefe de servicio, Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe. Valencia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30445/rear.v10i11.647

Keywords:

obstetric emergencies, simulation, evaluation

Abstract

Obstetric emergencies are situations that appear relatively frequent. In the last years, some studies suggest that many adverse outcomes  in obstetrics are produced by poor teamwork in emergencies. There are some assessment tools to evaluate the nontechnical skills of the teams in these situations. The purpose of this review was to find if these tools are valuable in obstetrics. 

References

Guise J-M, Segel S. Teamwork in obstetric critical care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;22(5):937–51.

Deering S, Johnston LC, Colacchio K. Multidisciplinary teamwork and communication training. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Apr;35(2):89–96.

Tregunno D, Pittini R, Haley M, Morgan PJ. Development and usability of a behavioural marking system for performance assessment of obstetrical teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Oct;18(5):393–6.

Guise J-M, Deering SH, Kanki BG, Osterweil P, Li H, Mori M, et al. Validation of a tool to measure and promote clinical teamwork. Simul Healthc. 2008;3(4):217–23

Sheen J-J, Lee C, Goffman D. The utility of bedside simulation for training in critical care obstetrics. Semin Perinatol. 2017 Nov 24;

Published

2020-09-10

How to Cite

Ródenas Monteagudo, M. Ángel, Gutiérrez Pérez, O., Romero García, E., & Argente Navarro, P. (2020). Evaluating team work in obstetric emergencies. Do we have the tools needed?. Revista Electrónica AnestesiaR, 10(11), 5. https://doi.org/10.30445/rear.v10i11.647

Issue

Section

Critical reviews of articles