High-flow conditioned oxygen therapy in preventing extubation failure

Authors

  • Irene Paredes Servicio de Medicina Intensiva Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo.
  • Laura Colinas Servicio de Medicina Intensiva Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo.
  • Alfonso Canabal Servicio de Medicina Intensiva Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo.
  • Gonzalo Hernández Servicio de Medicina Intensiva Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30445/rear.v10i2.636

Keywords:

oxygen therapy, MV, mechanical ventilation, OAF, PVE

Abstract

After recovery from the pathological process that has motivated the application of mechanical ventilation (MV), its removal as early as possible is always a fundamental objective. Current extubation criteria are not optimal, as 13-15% of patients need to be reintubated and this translates into mortality rates of 25-50%. Since other therapeutic alternatives to reintubation have not shown effectiveness in post-extubation respiratory failure, it is necessary to employ preventive measures. Work on preventing extubation failure has focused on specific causes of extubation failure [Ex. laryngeal edema and hypercapnia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)] or in high-risk populations in which the benefit of the preventive role of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has been demonstrated. Technological advances have allowed the development of high flow conditioned oxygen therapy (OAF); an oxygen support modality that offers air conditioning up to physiological situations (37ºC and 100% relative humidity), with a flow greater than 30 L / min and an inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) of up to 100%.

References

1.- Hernández G, Vaquero C, González P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G et al. Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on reintubation in low-risk patients. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 315:1354–61.
2.- Hernández G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, González P, Canabal A et al. Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs noninvasive ventilation on reintubation and postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316:1565-74.
3. – Ferrer M, Sellares J, Valencia M, Carrillo A, Gonzalez G, Badia JR et al. Noninvasive ventilation after extubation in hypercapnic patients with chronic respiratory disorders: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374:1082-1088.
4.- Nava S, Gregoretti C, Fanfulla F, Squadrone E, Grassi M, Carlucci A et al. Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Critical Care Medicine 2005; 33:2465-2470.
5.- Ferrer M, Valencia M, Nicolas JM, Bernadich O, Badia JR, Torres A et al. Early noninvasive ventilation averts extubaiton failure in patients at risk. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173:164-170.
6.- Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Godet T, Khoy-Ear L, Rozencwajg S, Delay JM et al. Effect of early postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on hypoxaemia in patients after major abdominal surgery: a french multicentre randomised controlled trial (OPERA). Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:1888-1898.

Published

2020-09-10

How to Cite

Paredes, I., Colinas, L., Canabal, A., & Hernández, G. (2020). High-flow conditioned oxygen therapy in preventing extubation failure. Revista Electrónica AnestesiaR, 10(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.30445/rear.v10i2.636